![]() Once we were logged in, Facebook for Google Chrome provided limited access to Facebook's capabilities. Even our first impression of Facebook for Google Chrome was negative we had to actually visit Facebook in our browser and log in before the extension would work, because there was no way to log in through the extension itself. The extension installs easily and places a small Facebook icon to the right of Chrome's address bar. Unfortunately, Facebook for Google Chrome is a disappointing combination of two of our favorite bits of Internet technology. Trump falsely claimed that the presidential election had been stolen from him as rioters overran the building seeking to overturn the election results.We like Facebook and we like Chrome, so we thought that a Facebook extension for Chrome sounded like a great idea. In a video posted to Facebook on January 6, Mr. Trump's accounts were banned after Twitter and Facebook found that his posts encouraged the attack on the Capitol. Trump's account in May, and the company announced in June that it would ban the former president from its platform for at least two years. The Facebook Oversight Board upheld the initial suspension of Mr. Trump agreed with Coale that they would keep the lawsuit under wraps until Wednesday's announcement. The former president's legal team plans to file a motion for preliminary injunction early next week – likely Monday or Tuesday – in an attempt to prohibit an injuction from the social media companies currently banning the former president and others from their platforms.Ĭoale said he first talked to the former president over the phone about three months ago, and Mr. I think it'll be a pretty good class size actually, when it's all said and done." ![]() So that's why we're hearing today from lots and lots of people. "I think it's going to be thousands and thousands of people. There were a number of Trump associates and backers kicked off the platform, including Steve Bannon, Roger Stone and Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio. The reason that Donald Trump is the main class rep is because he got it worse than anybody." Lawyers plan to have "subclasses" for a range of individuals stripped of social media privileges.Īs spelled out in the complaint, Coale alleges that removals by Twitter, Facebook and YouTube amount to censorship and violate a First Amendment right to free speech, despite protections under Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934.Ĭoale said there will be "a lot of high profile people … coming out of the woodwork" in the coming days. "It's basically anybody who was harmed or censored in one way or another by these companies, whether it's editorializing what they tweet or what they put on Facebook. The legal effort is being funded the American First Policy Institute, a think tank and 501(c)(3) non-profit created earlier this year by former Trump administration officials and headed up by Brooke Rollins and Linda McMahon.Ĭoale told CBS News he anticipates "thousands and thousands" will join the former president in his class-action lawsuit. Coale said his legal team includes attorneys he worked with in Louisiana when negotiated for smokers in the tobacco trials of the 1990s. Coale, who are directing a team of 20 attorneys, according to Coale. "Maybe he's got a trick up his sleeve that will give him a leg up on the dozens of lawsuits before him. "They've argued everything under the sun, including First Amendment, and they get nowhere," Goldman said. ![]() Michael M Santiago/GettyImages / Getty ImagesĮric Goldman, a law professor at Santa Clara University in California who has studied 60 similar, failed lawsuits that sought to take on internet companies for terminating or suspending users' accounts, told The Associated Press that Mr. Former President Trump speaks during a press conference announcing a class action lawsuit against big tech companies at the Trump National Golf Club Bedminster on July 7, 2021, in Bedminster, New Jersey. Twitter and Facebook both declined to comment. He's also asking the court to prevent Twitter, Facebook and YouTube from "exercising censorship, editorial control or prior restraint in its many forms" over the posts and uploads of the presidents. Trump asked the court to overturn Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects social media companies from liability for content posted on their platforms, and restore his accounts on Twitter and Facebook, as well as his channel on YouTube. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Mr.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |